Sunday, June 13, 2010

Who We Hate and Why They Suck

Love and hate are two of the strongest four-letter words in the English language. The other ones probably aren’t appropriate to be mentioned here. Nearly every article you will ever read on this site will deal with the teams we Wisconsinites love. This one, however, will be an expression of the mutual hatred that we all share for our rival teams. If you’re one of those happy-go-lucky individuals who claim that they don’t hate other teams or players just because of your fan affiliation then this article, and ultimately this site, is not for you.

Personally, I hate all kinds of things. I hate Kobe Bryant. I hate the Boston Celtics (as you can guess I’m struggling with these NBA Finals). I hate the Yankees. I hate Tom Brady. I hate Cris Collinsworth. I hate the Twilight saga. I hate female comedians. I hate that no matter how many shakes we men do after going to the bathroom a couple droplets always end up dripping down our legs. But I digress.

This article is about those teams that we can all sit around a campfire, drink and hate together. I think sometimes we get lost in our love for our own teams and forget why it’s so easy to hate all these losers, so I’m here to remind you of who we hate and why the suck.

The Minnesota Vikings
With what has happened in the past year I can’t think of a better team to start this off with than the Viqueens. First of all nice colors; purple and yellow? It looks like Fran Tarkenton ate a bushel of plums and then puked on their jerseys.

Secondly, Vikings are dumb. I’m pretty sure the name comes from the idea that Vikings once sailed up the St. Lawrence River looking for a route to the Pacific and eventually they realized the farthest they could get was a cold, desolate piece of land similar to their own, so they said, “Screw it. That’s a long trip back,” and just camped down in Minnesota instead. Some say that Vikings, not Christopher Columbus, were actually the first to discover America. Those people are foolish because Columbus was the man. My fourth grade social studies book was not lying to me. Awesome Italian men still exist today, like Leonardo DiCaprio for instance. Vikings, however, do not exist, which means they all died off because they were stupid and wore horned helmets instead of winter caps, just in case a rousing game of ring toss ever broke out. Vikings probably never existed. Someone should look into that.

(His name is Ragnar. I don't know why that's funny.)

As far as the football team goes they are historically bad. The Viqueens are one of ten teams to have never won a Super Bowl. They haven’t even reached one since the 1970s. How do you not make it to the Super Bowl with the record-breaking juggernaut offense they had in 1998 which consisted of Randall Cunningham chucking the ball around to two of the five greatest wide receivers of all time in Cris Carter and Randy Moss, not to mention Jake Reed in the slot and four-year wonder Robert Smith racking up rushing yards? Oh, now I remember. It was because they’re defense was led by John Randle who was too busy borrowing Ted Danson’s face make-up so he could put obscene amounts under his eyes even though the stuff is designed to help players with the sun and he was playing in a dome. Does anyone even understand that joke?

Antonio Freeman punked them on Monday Night Football. The Benedict Arnold-led Packers then traded punches with them for nearly a decade until the quarterback-to-remain-nameless (QTRN) switched sides and managed two narrow victories last season on account of Jared Allen wearing a cloak that makes him invisible to the eyes of Darryn Colledge. Luckily, Bryan Bulaga has a potion that renders the cloak useless and will, in turn, keep Aaron Rodgers off the turf long enough to pick apart their secondary and thoroughly beat the Viqueens into submission this year.

In no way do I blame the Viqueens for going after QTRN. If my quarterbacks were Sage Rosenfels and Tarvaris Jackson I’d pick a 40-year-old man off the street and give him a shot too. I do find it strange how quickly their fans endeared themselves to the man they hated on for over 15 years, which made it so much sweeter when they finally felt what it was like to deal with the heartbreak of a terrible, inexcusable, season-ending interception by QTRN. Too bad they’ll never know what it feels like for QTRN to lead them to a Super Bowl title. Too bad.

Also, the first down horn is, by far, the most annoying gimmick in professional sports. In essence, it’s just a louder version of the parents in Little Giants yelling, “We gained a yard!” They’re a bunch of losers and they will continue to be as long as they celebrate first downs so enthusiastically. (Please disregard the fact that the Little Giants won, and were extremely awesome)


The Chicago Cubs
Their track record speaks for itself. It has now been over 100 years since the Chicago Cubs have won the World Series. There were 16 teams in Major League Baseball 100 years ago. How hard is it to win a championship when there are 16 teams in the league? Don’t worry though, there’s a perfectly logical explanation for why they’ve sucked for a century. They were cursed by a goat. Really? That’s the reason? Have someone who knows nothing about baseball read that sentence and tell you how stupid it sounds. True, the Brewers have never won a World Series, but they’ve only been around since 1970. Come talk to me in 60 years or so, and if the Crew doesn’t have a title by then I’ll apologize. We don’t hate them for being losers of epic proportions though. In fact, that’s their best attribute; much better than their fans.

(Yeah throw the ball back! That'll hurt his feelings.)

Brewer fans cheer louder, act classier and party a lot harder than those flatlanders down at Wrigley. Cub fans, and their blind ignorance, love to group all current Brewer fans into a blanket of bandwagon jumpers. Personally, I saw Cal Eldred pitch in person on multiple occasions without once attending a C.C. Sabathia game, so hopefully I’m out from under that blanket, but I have one good reason for the influx in Brewer backers in recent years; intelligence. To Cub fans every year is ‘their year’. No matter how little hope the team showed the previous year and how many new $100 million contracts they doled out to .250-batting leftfielders, they still, for whatever reason, think they will win it all at the beginning of every season. The Brewers sucked for 20 years. The Cubs have sucked for 100. The only difference is Wisconsin people realized it. Plus it’s not too hard to fill up that pitiful-excuse for a stadium that seats about 18 people and is in desperate need of a weed whacker.

But at least they’re good losers right? (<---blatant sarcasm) The most recent time that the Cubs had a realistic shot at going to the World Series was in 2003. They would have most likely won the pennant that year if not for their shortstop, Alex Gonzalez, botching a routine ground ball in the eighth inning of game six. Instead of blaming Gonzalez though, the fans decided to ruin the life of a headphone-wearing, sweater-clad, innocent young man named Steve Bartman. Forget the fact that Moises Alou admitted he couldn’t have made a play on the foul ball that Bartman “interfered” with. They sent the man death threats and made him afraid to leave his home. Stay classy Chicago.

I don’t think I have to explain how much more fun the experience is at Miller Park compared to Wrigley Field. In the parking lot, we drink until we can’t stand, which is perfect because we have to sit down to watch the baseball game (and of course continue to drink). People can’t even tailgate at Wrigley. It must be rough having to continue to watch a team that bad without even a little buzz going in.

The Ohio State Buckeyes

This may be a surprise to some. I chose OSU over the Universities of Illinois and Michigan simply because they are more of a threat and truthfully have been the only Big Ten team to outperform the Badgers the last few years. Yes Illinois orange and blue is disgusting and Michigan is epically overrated, but Ohio State’s nickname is a seed. That has to be THE least masculine team name in the world. Seeds don’t even do anything bad. They’re seeds.

Anyways, I’d have to say I have an equal amount of hatred for both the football and basketball teams. Jim Tressel always looks like he’s waiting on a tee time and Thad Matta…well Thad Matta has a stupid name. Bo Ryan is twice the coach Matta is, but the swing offense isn’t exactly appealing to high school All-Americans. Ryan has been a more successful coach with a team usually led by players who won’t even sniff the league. Matta is bringing in another stud, Jared Sullinger, next year, and I’m sure he’ll hang around for one season, compete for the Big Ten title, make it to the sweet sixteen and bail.

Some people like to cheer for the Big Ten as a whole. These are the ones who root for anyone from our conference as long as they’re playing someone from a different conference. These are the kind of people that don’t genuinely understand hate. I hate the Ohio State Buckeyes. I will never cheer for them no matter who they’re playing and honestly don’t understand people that can do that. “Well if they can beat USC and get ranked higher then it’ll look better if the Badgers beat them.” No. Any level of misery that can Ohio State can be put through isn’t enough to satisfy a true Badger fan. When their football team lost the National Championship to Florida in 2006, I could not have been happier. Oh yeah, and add Florida football to the list of things I hate. That’s how badly I hate OSU.

Is it possible that I’m envious of the success that Ohio State has had in both sports recently? It’s possible. But, to be completely truthful I couldn’t see myself cheering for Maurice Clarett, Terrelle Pryor, Evan Turner, or any of those one-and-done ballers from a few years back. Ohio State and their athletes are too prima donnic for the Big Ten (pretty sure prima donnic is not a real phrase, but…now it is).

Did I mention their “mascot” is a seed?


The Chicago Bears
Remember the Bears finally turning their franchise around last year by acquiring that Pro Bowl-caliber quarterback Jay Cutler? Remember Kyle Orton then proceeding to outperform Jay Cutler and Cedric Benson running wild in Cincinnati? Haha, me too.

First thing's first. The names of these Chicago teams are even more idiotic than the Vikings and Buckeyes. There are no bears in Chicago. I don’t know the last time there were. There is no reason they should have TWO professional sports teams named after a mammal that doesn’t exist anywhere near the city. And why would one of them be named after the infant version? Real threatening. I have no doubts that a drunken, mustached man could easily destroy a baby bear.

(Short rant: Is it just me or does Wisconsin have, by far, the most fitting team names of any city or state in America? The Brewers, Bucks and Packers all make complete sense. There are no Lions in Detroit. There are no Grizzlies in Memphis. The only other places I can think of whose names all make sense are Miami and Denver/Colorado. There needs to be a national team re-naming conference.)

Back to the Bears. They are the only one of the three pro teams I’ve talked about that have had a relatively decent amount of success in recent years, even making it to a Super Bowl following the 2006 season while being led by possibly the worst quarterback to ever play in the big game, Rex Grossman. Of course they lost in a monsoon to a dome team, but they gave it a good try.

I don’t know what there is to like about a team that rotates offensive skill players nearly every year trying to find a combination sufficient enough to complement their overrated defense. Cutler, while probably one of the franchise’s best quarterback talents ever, is not the answer to their woes. It’s not like he was overwhelmingly successful in Denver, so why would bringing him to a team with significantly less offensive talent make him better? It didn’t, and frankly he’s ruining the one real promising player they had, Matt Forte.

Lovie Smith is now one of the longest tenured coaches in the league and no one knows why. This year they have Mike Martz calling the plays though, which will basically result in Cutler overthrowing Earl Bennett and Devin Aromashodu when Martz calls a go route every other play and Forte continuing to not get the touches he deserves. (Fun fact: Earl Bennett and Jay Cutler played college football together at Vanderbilt. Wait…that’s not a fun fact. No one cares, and if you watched one Bears game this year you should be sick of hearing it. Shut up Collinsworth!)

Basically, we just hate the Bears because they’re from Chicago and it’s fun to watch our team beat up on their team. I really fail to find a reason for anyone on earth who wasn’t around in 1985 to be a Bears fan, but to each his own.

So that’s it. Those are the three crappy organizations that we can all agree are pathetic and inferior to our own, and one whose team is named after a seed. You may ask, “What about the Twins, or any NBA team?” Well, our “rivalry” with the Twins is more of a friendly feud because we aren’t battling them for anything significant, and honestly the NBA is currently short on rivalries in general. A little fire between the Bucks and Bulls would be great, so if you’re reading this Dan Gadzuric (assuming you can read), do something useful for once and punch Joakim Noah in the face. You would instantly become the most popular player in the league.

Now one more thing and I gotta go. I don’t know how strongly I can emphasize that hate is necessary in sport. You can’t truly put all of your will into wanting to beat someone unless you absolutely hate their guts. So, if you read through this article and still insist that you can’t hate someone over a simple game then just pretend that Lou Piniella tried to lure you into his van with free candy when you were eight years old. Trust me, if you gave him the chance, he would have.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

The Wisconsin Youth Movement



Brett Favre is gone and he’s not coming back, the days of the Bucks’ Big Three have long been over and the Brewers have dispensed the two bright spots from an era of dismal team performance, Geoff Jenkins and Ben Sheets.

Despite the loss of a number of talented players in all three major sports over the past five years, Wisconsin has nothing to worry about. All three teams have some of the best young stars in their respective leagues, and stunningly those stars fill the exact roles of their predecessors. And they fill them more than admirably.
Brett Who?
The Favre saga has been done to death and frankly I’m tired of it. So I’ll just pose this question. Who ya got?

Quarterback A: 59.9% Completions 3899 yards 39 TDs 13 INTs 95.8 QB Rating
Quarterback B: 64.7% Completions 4434 yards 30 TDs 7 INTs 103.2 QB Rating

I’ll take Quarterback B.

Quarterback A is Brett Favre during the 1996 season when he led the Packers to a 13-3 record, their first Super Bowl victory in 29 years and won his second of three consecutive MVP awards.

Quarterback B is Aaron Rodgers last season, his second as a starter, during which he narrowly missed setting the franchise record for yards (held by Lynn Dickey) and kept pace with Drew Brees, Peyton Manning and Philip Rivers in one of the best quarterback years in the history of the NFL. Throw in the fact that he finished second in rushing yards by a quarterback with 316 (seven yards less than David Garrard) and pitched in five more touchdowns on the ground, and you’d be hard-pressed to convince me that Quarterback A played better.

Don’t get me wrong, no matter how much I hate Favre right now for going Fredo Corleone on the state of Wisconsin, he deserves all the respect in the world from Packer fans for almost single-handedly bringing the team back to relevance during his Hall-of-Fame run here, but has Rodgers done anything over the course of his career to make anyone believe that he won’t be just as, if not more, effective as Old Man River up in Minnesota? Durability may be the biggest legacy Favre left for Rodgers to live up to, but after seeing A-Rod (for lack of a better nickname) get back up after every one of the league-leading 50 sacks he endured in 2010, including a ridiculous 20 before the week five bye, who’s to say that he’s not every bit as durable?

If Ted Thompson can manage to keep Rodgers surrounded by a bona fide number one receiver (Jennings), solid complementary wideouts (the ageless Driver, Nelson and Jones) and a soon-to-be-stud tight end (Finley), all the while continuing to improve the offensive line it’s pretty safe to say we’ll see plenty more 4000 yard-30 TD-100 QB Rating years from the new green and gold signal caller.

Fear the Fawns
In 2001, led by the Big Three of Ray Allen, Glenn Robinson and Sam Cassell, the Bucks made a serious run at an NBA Championship, something rarely seen since the days of Oscar and Kareem (although Don Nelson led some great teams in the 80s). Two seasons after their heartbreaking loss in the Eastern Conference Finals to the Iverson-led Sixers all three players had been discarded for various reasons (old age, salary cap relief, Michael Redd’s emergence), and just like that a three-star team had been disassembled and a less-than-one-star team had replaced it. At the same time, General Manager Ernie Grunfeld had been replaced by the equally-incapable Larry Harris.

After suffering through five excruciating Michael Redd-led (using the term “led” generously) seasons, something changed, and, thanks to general manager John Hammond, three (four if you want to get technical, but we’ll get there in a bit) new, younger and more promising stars emerged that Bucks fans can only hope will be around for many successful years in Brew Town.

Since entering the league, Andrew Bogut has struggled to live up to expectations, but trying to prove yourself after being chosen number one overall in the 2005 draft, following Lebron James and Dwight Howard the previous two years and ahead of draftmates and now All-NBA point guards Deron Williams and Chris Paul, is a daunting task for anyone to deal with.

Something clicked in Bogut’s head this season however. It’s almost as if three games into the year, as Redd missed his first game due to injury, the Big Aussie finally said, “Ok, if he’s going to keep getting hurt I guess I’m the best player on team, time to act like it,” and he did just that. His season, and career, culminated in a 24-point 20-rebound performance at Madison Square Garden in a big EFF YOU! to Knicks “center” David Lee, who weeks before had been voted into the All-Star game over Bogut himself.

One has to believe that if not for that horrific arm injury Bogut suffered late in the season against the Phoenix Suns, the Bucks would have secured the fifth seed in the East and very possibly upset the Boston Celtics in the first round. In the end, despite missing 13 games due to injury, sportswriters rightfully named Bogut third team All-NBA and finally ushered him into the club of centers to be feared.

The second piece of the Bucks young trifecta may be a confusing one to some, so an explanation is necessary. In his second year, Luc Richard mbah Moute has proven himself to be a lockdown defender with some crafty interior moves. At the same time, Ersan Ilyasova after a short professional stint in Spain returned to the Bucks this past season and made a tremendous impact shooting threes, hitting the offensive glass and making tough running bank-shots. Now, wouldn’t it be great if these two incessant hustlers could combine their strengths to create one well-rounded basketball player. Well, who says they can’t? I call him Luc Ersan mbah Sova. He can lock down Dirk Nowitzki on one end of the floor and then come down and hit a 26-footer on the other end.

If mbah Sova can play the full 48 minutes allotted to the Bucks’ power forward position and at the same time log a few more at the 3 and the 5 spots (which is hypothetically impossible, but hey, he’s my creation) he could be a force to be reckoned with in the near future. I’ll just leave it at that for this article as mbah Sova continues to grow in my head and so the last part of the young triumvirate can receive the space he is due.

Brandon Jennings. Young Buck. BJ3. Double Nickel. The nickname and the shooting percentage might be the only two things that need a drastic upgrade by next season. In the following paragraphs I will attempt to convince anyone reading this that Brandon Jennings will be the biggest Wisconsin sports SUPERSTAR for however long he decides to remain in the state.

Scoring 55 points in just his seventh NBA game (minus the first quarter) may have placed impossibly high to reach expectations on the youngster, but to me it shows one thing; It. For lack of a better word, Brandon Jennings has It, understands It and once he learns to harness It he will be a threat to repeat that legendary performance every single night. It is what makes you think Lebron James might just score 60 points in a half some day or Dwight Howard might put up a 30-30 on a December night against the Clippers. There are a handful of guys in the league today that have It and Jennings is in elite company.

Not to take anything away from Tyreke Evans and Steph Curry who had tremendous seasons and, according to the voters, both deserved the Rookie of the Year award more than Jennings. But ask yourself; which rookie put up 29 points in a quarter against none other than Curry’s Warriors? Which Compton-born point man by way of Virginia and Italy was leading, repeat….leading, his overachieving squad into the month of May? Which level-headed 20-year-old, despite making over $2 million in salary this year is driving a Ford Edge around a blue-collar city he now calls home? The answer to those questions tells you which of the three is going to end up the true superstar.

Should we be including Jennings in the discussion with James, Howard, Durant and Wade just yet? No. He shot 37% from the floor in his rookie campaign. Will he be in that conversation three years from now? I say yes, because he has It. With a little bulk and a little better shot selection Jennings has all the makings to be one of the best guards in the league. Paul and Williams both have It to an extent, and, as evidenced by the confidence to spend a year in Italy learning the game as well as be the face of an experimental basketball venture by Under Armour, Jennings may have even more of It than the league’s two best point guards.

In short, It is a combination of passion, dedication, talent, innovation, pride and swagger. It is something you’re born with. It cannot be taught by Phil Jackson, Pat Riley or Master Splinter. It makes you great. There is much more to be said about Jennings and It, but in the interest of space I end the section with this; possibly the best visual representation I can give you of It.

Mr. Hammond, please keep this kid around.

Two Brews Please
For ten full seasons Geoff Jenkins epitomized what a Milwaukee Brewer should be. He may not be given enough credit for his contributions to the club because of the complete lack of anything resembling success that his teams achieved, but he was always the ultimate professional. Jenkins played hard every single day and played at a high level on teams that were lucky to get 60 wins some seasons. And can’t you just picture him in a different lifetime tipping back a few cans of Pabst Blue Ribbon with his shirt off in the Lambeau Field parking lot? He was a Wisconsin kind of guy. Oh, and he grew up in Southern California.

Now, turn him around the other side of the plate, give him the discipline to hit the ball the other way, surround him with some talent, replace the PBRs with shots of Patron, and presto, you have current Brewer stud Ryan Braun. I’m not telling anyone anything they don’t know by saying Ryan Braun is one of the best young hitters of all-time. Bill Schroeder can barely get through a telecast without bringing up that list of “most homeruns by a player in his first four seasons”. I’m just saying be thankful for what we have fellow Brewers fans (and for what we always had). Aside from Cardinals fans since Albert Pujols’ debut and quite possibly Braves fans in the blossoming Jason Heyward era, no one in this century has been given the opportunity to watch as good of a hitter day-in day-out. Braun simply doesn’t get fooled, doesn’t put bad swings on the ball and occasionally hits 470-foot bombs off the scoreboard in Arizona with Geoff Jenkins sitting in the crowd smiling.

Now what about that pitcher who consistently throws 95 mph to go along with a huge 12-6 curve and an effective but underused changeup? That one who came up through the Brewers organization and completed his first impressive big-league season at the age of 22, giving fans confidence that they’d have at least one strong link in the club’s pitching rotation for years to come. If you think you know who I’m talking about you’re wrong, because honestly, as I’m writing this, I am not entirely sure who I’m describing more aptly, Ben Sheets or Yovani Gallardo. The similarities are uncanny, and hopefully Yo can stay healthy longer than Sheets managed to.

No offense directed towards Sheets. In fact, he was my absolute favorite Brewer for the better part of a decade. He should have finished second in the Cy Young voting in 2004 behind Randy Johnson. It’s actually ridiculous how Roger Clemens won the award that year when Johnson posted a .900 WHIP, look it up. Unfortunately Sheets finished eighth in that award race with an equally ridiculous one vote. Not one first place vote. One TOTAL vote. 34 starts, a 2.70 ERA, 264 Ks, a 0.983 WHIP and one single Cy Young vote. Every season after that was riddled with various injuries. Eventually Sheets’ Brewer career ended after the 2008 campaign that sadly and fittingly concluded with him tearing his flexor tendon, causing him to sit out the entire 2009 MLB season.

Although Gallardo has already missed nearly an entire season due to a freak ankle injury in 2008, that doesn’t seem to be the thing most likely to prevent him from reaching elite starter status. That would be his walk totals. Gallardo’s strikeout statistics are practically as impressive as Sheets’ were at the high point of his career, but he needs to learn how to trust those nasty pitches and dare hitters to do something with them. That part of his game will develop, and once it does he can start challenging the Lincecums and Carpenters of the world.

No matter how many .500 seasons we have to deal with from the Crew, as long as Braun and Gallardo are around we will continue to hold on to the hope that maybe….just maybe this will be our year.

Now, one more thing and I gotta go. Think about it how good we actually have it Wisconsin fans. Rodgers. Bogut, mbah Sova and Jennings. Braun and Gallardo. Show me another fan base with young talent at that level and I’ll show you…..well I’ll show you my middle finger, pour a beer on your head and keep rooting religiously for all things Wisconsin.